Different but the same

I don’t drink OJ, I think it has to do something with me being an idiot in 3rd grade.  I needed an empty carton for a school project and forced down 3/4 of a container of Minute Maid down my throat for it.  Moments after I completed that feat, my mom walks in and said I didn’t look too good. I told her what I just did and she responded with “Why didn’t you just pour it into another container?”  I can’t remember what that school project was but I will never forget the enormous feeling of  pure “DUH” at that moment and orange juice has been a turn off to me ever since.  I know it has nothing to do with packaging but after 30 years I just had to tell someone.
I think most of us remember ”Tropic-Ana” from the earlier days.  She was fazed out sometime the late80’s/early 90’s.  some might say it was weird to have a topless little girl on a container of orange juice but…well I guess it was.  It’s not like the simple drawing is flaunting anything but still there seems something kind of wrong about it.  I do like the simple colors and font but it if you take out Ana, it would almost look like a generic company product.
The new container recently change from paper carton to plastic bottle.  The brand name font is slightly similar to the old although it has a very small gradient and added a leaf to dot the “i”.  It’s not a bad design, it doesn’t go down in the hall of fame of designs but there’s nothing wrong with it.  The only thing I’m not a fan of is the orange,  I think it would have looked great to have a more 2-D, stylized version of the orange and famous striped straw.
As I was doing a little research on the new container, I came across an interesting fact about the straw. The great blog  readysetlaunch, nicely documented the change from the “newer” old package to the new:

Apparently when they changed to a package without the red and white straw, people freaked out and demanded it back , Tropicana caved and gave the people what they wanted.  So although they have changed the package again, they made sure to keep the straw.
And finally I couldn’t help but mention the former  Tropicana spokesman Bruce Jenner since he was in the ad I found in my magazine collection.

And that’s all I’ll say about that.

 Loading ...

(Bonus poll!)

 Loading ...

I won’t get into how my sisters and I weren’t allowed to eat “sugar cereal” again.  But these monster cereals were like…beyond even even beggin for.  Honestly I never even had any of these, Count, Boo, Frank…was there mummy or “beast” that was around for a while too?
Even though I’m an adult and can buy these if I want, it just hasn’t happened.   I’ve heard General Mills has changed the recipe with these cereals and they’re not as good they used to be so I feel like that window of awesomeness has closed and what’s the point of trying something not in it’s prime.
So onto the package design- quite a difference between 80’s Count and current.  The old box has a vacant feel like the very 2 dimensionally drawn Count walked into a green screen set with a bowl of cereal. The current is a computer generated image that kind of looks like he should be the son of the Count.  How does he look younger than he did 25+ years ago?  Well, I guess hes a vampire.  The current box depicts his home (Castle Chocula?) but is lacking an image of the product itself, which I always think is nice to see what you’re getting.  There is a small description of “Chocolatey cereal with spooky-fun marshmallows” compared to the older “Chocolate flavored frosted cereal +marshmallow bits”
While neither description is overly appealing I guess they do a better job with the current description with calling it “Chocolately” because whenever I read “Chocolate flavored..” anything it usually tastes like blech.
Visually, I like the old box because the new one I feel like the count is too in my face and is lacking an image of the product.

What do you think?

 Loading ...

Nair, most commonly known (or at least used to be) for asking who wears short shorts, is something I tried once and left it alone after that.  I was always a little weirded out that you can roll on this glop, let it sit and it removes hair but doesn’t harm your skin?  Although, they clearly have a following because it’s still in production and has a whole line of products.  Maybe I should try it again, I’m sure it’d been developed to be less fumey now.
The 80’s packaging on the left is kind of girly looking with the pink bottle and label and curvy title font.  The package has a friendly-approachable look to it both in bottle shape and label.

The new package uses the same color theme but seems a little more…I don’t know, cold and clinical?  The title font isn’t as “fun” and has been slimmed down and is sharper.  There are some curves on the side but are more sleek than the wavy banner o the old bottle.  There’s also the addition of an actual girl/lady.  I don’t know why but it always bothers me when they put a needlessly naked chick strategically posed on a package or ad.

 Loading ...

So for that reason alone I’d prefer the old package but I also think it has a more welcoming look too.   The new bottle is okay (minus naked chick) but it does look like something you’d find in a hospital supply cabinet

I know it doesn’t seem like it, but I really miss this blog.  I always seem inspired to post when I can’t, like when I’m at work, driving, grocery shopping, etc..
So I’ll post whenever I can but anyway, I was going through some old files looking for something else and came across my stash of old  ads I scanned and All-Bran kind of called out to me.

I never had this cereal but I remember my dad was all about it for a while.  The image on the left is from a 1982 ad.  I like this box because it kind of reminds me of the 70’s Clue game cards.  There’s just an element of mystery.  The almost eerie silence of a still-life, and just a hint of something…off.  A couple of neatly placed grains of wheat to the right of the bowl and a hovering spoon  either being held by the cereal eater by the very edge or it’s levitating over the cereal.  I do like the stark contrast of the mustard-colored bowl and plate against the robins egg table cloth.

The current box is ok.  It’s much brighter and I think more inviting.   I feel like it’s a lighter vibe overall, not just with the white background but the font and the replacement of raspberries for bananas.  I guess like with everything there’s 100 versions the same products now so I picked original which is noted by a clearly marked tripe across the middle of the package.  The title font got the beveled and slightly warped treatment. They ditched the plate the bowl sits on but hey decided to keep the grains.

I think they’re both effective as portraying the product and having  shelf recognition but I do like the starkness of the old package.

 Loading ...

Hands-down, one of my all time favorite cereals.  It also works well instead of rice krispies in the usual treat recipe.
I remember when CTC joined the cereal scene in 1985, I was in 5th grade and  it was actually “exciting”.
The poorly scanned box on the left is from a 1985 ad.  You can barely make out the lined-paper background.  The title
is in multi-color marker/crayon font.  I’m not sure what the reason for the elementary school theme is other than to appeal to kids ( like myself at the time) but still, you’d think maybe something more reflective of the product might be used. Nonetheless, it looks cute and the smiling toast is adorable.
The new box keeps a multi-color font but that’s about it.   The background features the cereal swirling down to what looks like a  slightly psychotic baker at the bottom of the box.
I think even less appealing is their new…thing in commercials featuring two pieces of the cereal that, eat each other(?)

eeeee!
I don’t know what’s going on but I’d prefer the more innocent version of CTC.  I will say it still one of the best tasting cereals out there.

 Loading ...

I always thought St. Ives was the cheapest, lowest quality skin care products.  I don’t know if they really are but I had that in my mind because we had it in our house.
This is a rare case of not liking the old package design at all.  I really can’t pinpoint why I don’t like it but some of it is the font of “St. Ives”,  part is the drawing of the mountains and featured botanical images that just look like weeds and in this case, the colors are just drab.   To be fair, it probably also reminds me of the low-quality,  pink-colored gelatinous  product that just seemed to slide around my face and not absorb like a “normal” moisturizer.
The new design is simple and non-cluttered, the font is clean looking and the color scheme is bright and “fresh”.  It makes you think that maybe there isn’t a pink glob of facial putty in there but a somewhat natural creme that feels light and refreshing.
Kudos to St. Ives for a great redesign.

 Loading ...

I’m don’t usually drink soda but I’ve always ad a fondness for Pepsi.  To make a long story short, my sister and I would help out in my dad’s auto part store from 1978-1983 and there was a soda machine with Pepsi products that you’d slide the cans out yourself, which we of course to a free pass to.  As we’d “help” throughout the day our cans of Pepsi would sit around and get flat and warm (especially if we left them in the display windows we were cleaning) and to this day if  I drink a Pepsi, I prefer it flat and warm.
Although my sister were just kids we didn’t bother drinking Diet Pepsi but I have to say looking at the can really brings me back.  The design is really great.  I don’t know if it makes me think of it being a diet drink but the title font is one of my all-time favorites even though I don’t know the name of it – but I love it when I see it.  Also, the waves look somewhat calming at the bottom and remind me of Love Boat.  I would have thought they’d use three colors – one for each wavy line but they must have known what they’re doing because it’s so recognizable in a second when I see it.
This photo was from a 1985 ad when NutraSweet was really gaining popularity so unfortunately, there’s a red parallelogram that interferes with the waves.
Diet Pepsi had since gone through a  few design incarnations but here is the latest (that I know of) with the “Obama” logo on a plain grey can.  The title font is similar but thinner and placed vertically instead of horizontally.  It’s almost easy to miss if you’re just scanning the shelves.  What stands out most is just the logo and I guess you’re supposed to know from the color of the can being grey that it’s the diet version of the symbol known as Pepsi.
It’s okay and I like it’s simplicity but doesn’t speak to me the way the old can does.
There was also a little display at the bottom of the page of their other diet products I thought was worth sharing:

 Loading ...

I have this box/tube of Brylcreem I bought at a 5 & dime last year.  There isn’t a date on the package but I did buy a really old Shine Free powder identical to the kind I used to get in 1985.  There were lots of items in there from the 70’s and 80’s and looking at the design I’ll guess this was late 70’s/early 80’s.

Comparing the old (top) package  and the new one,  there doesn’t seem to be all too much of an update to the current design.  While the color scheme is the same, some things have changed.  The new font is a stark white and ever so slightly slanted to the right. There’s a little more information on the new package and a slogan quite but for the most part is pretty simple.
But (of course) I really like the old package because the font is orange and I think it makes more of an impact on the overall look of the box.  I think what really makes the whole design is the white stripe down the “l”.  It’s so simple but really makes the package look like there’s something “more” to it.  I’m just a huge fan of sport stripes anyway so this particularly appeals to me, but I also think they chose the perfect font for it too.  It’s like…art.  Love it!

 Loading ...

I know it might not seem like it, but I’ve missed posting on here.  Going through old ads is one of my favorite things to do and it’s bothered me that I haven’t had time to do that.
Work has been crazy and I thought I’d have more free time after months of training for Boston and I think things are finally slowing down enough to get back to the blogging world.
I still have my growing pile of old magazines to get to, but while I was out this weekend I came across a new product  with such pleasant packaging I thought it was blogworthy.
I give you Thomas’ pretz-a-bagels.
Sure, the font is beveled and outlined and there’s the commonly used beams of light from the center of the design, but what makes this package is the pretzel and bagel shaking hands.
Does it get more adorable than that??  It’s actually an interesting concept for a product and makes me happy for the design team because you KNOW they had a blast coming up with this graphic.   I feel like you don’t see images like that anymore.   Simple and illustrative that easily conveys what the product is in a single image.  Bravo Thomas’!

It’s a little ironic but this new item has kick-started my love for retro packaging.  Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a bunch of old crappy magazines to go through!!

 Loading ...

We only had a dog for a year or so in 1979.  She was a Golden Retriever named Honey and ran away.  One night about a week later, she came back during a rain storm. My sister and I were so happy and then the next morning she ran away again, for good.  That’s the extent of my dog ownership so I don’t have much experience with buying dog food but I know what I like in packaging and this 1985 Fit & Trim bag is just awesome.
A green background with a nicely contrasting yellow font. The Purina checker board logo fits nicely anchored in the upper left corner. I love the cleverly designed title font that looks like measuring tape- so cute!   As if that’s not adorable enough the cartoon dog is running wearing a track suit. And if that’s not cute enough- look the expression on the dog’s face-he’s so into it,  total runner high going on there.

The new package is more sleek and does convey a feeling of fitness with it’s slim, beveled and drop-shadowed font and light colors.  There are actual images of the product and ingredients as well as a real dog and a seemingly slightly dis-proportioned owner in tow.  The dog is so fit that it’s walking right off the bag out of the little semi-circle of scenery. It’s okay, nothing overly outstanding and to me and is certainly no competition for the awesome font and adorable cartoon of the older package.

 Loading ...